Mario Lutz Founder


 Number of posts: 1402 Age: 44 Location: Puerto Galera, Philippines Points: 3784 Registration date: 2008-03-06
 | Subject: CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER DECLARED CANDIDATE FOR LISTING UNDER CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Sat 28 Feb - 18:11 | |
| News Release February 27, 2009 Court Order Required to Force State to Accept Listing Petition
SACRAMENTO, Calif.— The California Fish and Game Commission last week formally designated the California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense) as a candidate for threatened or endangered status under the California Endangered Species Act, extending legal protections to the species for one year while a status review is conducted. The Commission was forced by a Center for Biological Diversity petition and lawsuit, and a recent court of appeals ruling, to make the designation, and yesterday also illegally approved interim “take” regulations that improperly exempt projects that may harm tiger salamanders from the interim take protections under the Act.
“Despite the Fish and Game Commission’s misguided attempts to repeatedly deny protected status to the California Tiger Salamander, the candidate designation sets the listing process back on the right track and should ultimately result in the tiger salamander getting the state protected status it deserves,” said Jeff Miller, a conservation advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity. “Every expert biologist who studies the California Tiger Salamander has weighed in and recommended the species be listed.”
The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Commission in 2004 to list the California Tiger Salamander as endangered due to the impacts of urban and agricultural development. The Santa Barbara County salamander population has been listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act since 2000, as has the Sonoma County population since 2003. The central California population has been federally listed as threatened since 2004.
The Commission rejected the petition in 2004, falsely claiming it did not contain all of the data necessary to prove the salamander population deserved protection. The Center filed suit, and the Commission was forced by court order and a state appeals court ruling in September 2008 to accept the petition. The state Supreme Court refused to review the appeals court ruling. The Commission last week voted 3-2 for candidacy, clearly reluctant to protect the species. One Commissioner repeatedly referred to the presence of California Tiger Salamanders on private land as a “salamander problem” and referred to the court that issued the petition acceptance order as a “jerks” and “stupid.”
The Commission also voted Thursday to implement incidental “take” regulation containing overly broad exemptions that allow projects to harm California Tiger Salamanders without conducting an adequate review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
State candidate species are afforded many of the legal protections of endangered or threatened species while a year-long status review is conducted. A final state listing determination for the California Tiger Salamander is due in February 2010.
The court decision on the California Tiger Salamander has potential implications for other poorly monitored species, since the court ruled that the Commission must consider a listing petition if the information would “lead a reasonable person to conclude there is a substantial possibility” that the species could be listed.
In 2008 the Commission denied a listing petition to protect the American Pika, a small relative of the rabbit, which is threatened by warming temperatures due to global climate change. In 2008 it also denied a petition to protect the Pacific Fisher, a small forest carnivore that is related to otters and is threatened by logging and development in California. In both cases, the Commission claimed a lack of information prevented it from acting to protect the species. The Commission last week voted to reconsider the fisher petition rejection at its March meeting, due to the California Tiger Salamander ruling, but is expected to reject the fisher petition once again.
The California Tiger Salamander depends on ephemeral vernal pools for breeding. In recent decades 95 percent of California’s vernal pools have been lost, and at least 75 percent of the salamander’s habitat throughout the state has been eliminated. In Sonoma County, 95 percent of the fragmented and minimal remaining salamander habitat is threatened by development; the Santa Barbara population is also on the verge of extinction. The Sonoma population survives in only seven viable breeding sites and the Santa Barbara population consists of only six breeding groups.
The Center for Biological Diversity is a nonprofit conservation organization with 200,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
Jeff Miller Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94104 Phone: (415) 436-9682 x303 Fax: (415) 436-9683 http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/ _________________ Attitude, rather than disposition is more definitive of serpent behavior. From the moment they emerge into this world until they complete their life cycle, their attitude is "Don't tread on me. I am well equipped to defend myself, but content to pass through life unnoticed. I mean no harm to anything or anyone that our creator has not provided as my bill of fare; I am self sustaining and I like it that way, please pass me by." - W.E. Haast
|
|